About Me

Name: reasonmclucus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Dear President Bush -- About That Bailout

The following is an expanded copy of a letter I emailed to President Bush earlier today.
 
If you want voters to support a bailout you should change it so general taxpayers don't have to pay for it.  Taxpayers didn't cause the problem.   Greedy executives did.  Greedy bankers were so anxious to get richer that they made loans they shouldn't have made.

Any bailout payment should take the form of negotiable federal securities rather than cash.   The bailout program should be separate from the general budget. 

Securities would be paid off by mortgage payments, sale of foreclosed homes etc. plus special taxes on business.  One such tax could apply to money spent on executive salaries above some amount, for example $200,000 per year. The tax would be assessed even if the company not have a taxable income.   Another tax could apply to certain financial transactions or upon the income of financial institutions, etc. A tax on short term capital gains would be appropriate.  These taxes could be set to expire whenever sufficient funds were accumulated to pay off the securities.

This payment approach would force the people who caused the problem to pay to correct it.   Those who tried to buy homes they couldn't really afford would pay part of the money for the bailout.  Sale of  the bad assets would convert them to cash to pay for the bailout.  The companies that failed because of the credit crisis in some cases purchased bad assets from companies that remain profitable because they unloaded the bad assets they created. Thus it would be fair to force the companies that  didn't fail to pay part of the cost of  the bailout.  High salaries by other companies forced the failed companies to pay higher salaries than they should have paid.  Thus it would be fair to require all companies that pay high salaries to help pay for the bailout.

Only a small portion of the U.S. population caused the credit crisis.  They shouldn't expect  those who didn't contribute to the problem to bail them out.  Creditors have been exploiting people for years by charging excessive interest and fees.  Now that they are in trouble they want someone else to force those they have exploited to pay for their mistakes.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Neither Candidate Can Handle Economic Crisis


The economic portion of the so called debate Friday night was a waste of time. Neither candidate provided more than a vague set of conditions for evaluating any proposal. They want us to put them in charge,  but have nothing to offer for dealing with the current  crisis. 

But their lack of any solution shouldn't be surprising. If either had a solution to the credit he would have been in Washington trying to get Congress to adopt his solution instead of debating in Mississippi.  Hopefully, President George W. Bush will solve the problem before they take office.

Sen. Barack Obama kept trying to bring  up the issue of health care which is irrelevant to the credit crisis.  In general Obama seems more concerned with playing the blame game than ending the crisis.    The important thing now is to end the crisis. 

Both candidates repeated the old religions of their parties. 

Sen. John McCain says he  is going to freeze  federal spending except for defense and entitlement programs. It'll never happen.  Republicans have been talking about that for decades and  haven't succeeded. 

Most programs have too many supporters in Congress to be reduced.  Federal agencies often have regional offices, and the communities with those offices will  pressure  their  congressional delegation to  keep  those offices open.  The communities  or organizations that benefit  will also lobby for keeping the programs.

Sen; Obama claims he's going to raise revenue by closing corporate loopholes.  Democrats have been promising to do that for decades and haven't succeeded yet.  Congress creates new loopholes faster than it eliminates old ones.  Even if Congress did eliminate loopholes no money could be raised by taxing companies that are already losing money. 

McCain has a better chance to freeze spending than Obama has to eliminate corporate loopholes.  The president can veto spending bills.  The president cannot force congress to close tax loopholes.

McCain is correct  that Obama's spending program  would require a general tax increase rather than a reduction.  If Obama really believes that he can cut taxes and increase spending, those nice young men in their clean white coats need to take him to the happy home.  

According to the Main Stream Media, Obama is supposed to be stronger on economic issues.  I saw no evidence of that Friday night.

Based on the comments  the  candidates made on the economic situation  during the debate we would be better off keeping President George W. Bush for the next four years or bringing back Bill Clinton.  Many  people have forgotten that  Bush brought  us through the economic crisis  that followed  the 9/11 attack.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »